![]() It's one of the easy ways of following the NOTDIR guideline. The lead section, however, makes the inclusion criteria explicit. Dadodband ( talk) 06:16, 1 June 2009 (UTC) Reply Regarding "notable", that's one of the standard guidelines for all "list of" pages, and WP:LISTNAME says the article title shouldn't bother stating it. I would also like to somehow see Green Search Engines appear here somewhere - under Models perhaps? The technology often sits on Google or Yahoo's APIs, but the business model is quite different and there are several out there that deserve mention (Quevr, Blackle, etc). ![]() This list should actually be more exhaustive than that. Zim Zala Bim talk 04:33, (UTC) Reply I’m not sure I agree with just listing notable search engines here, as that restriction is not the title of the page. Regarding "excluding anything new", be aware that only notable search engines should be listed here. 216.121.202.202 ( talk) 04:20, (UTC) Reply You are likely referring to Wolfram Alpha, which is listed. Maybe you need another classification for ``Recently Offered Engines``. From reading the discussions, it looks like you exclude anything new. ![]() ![]() I don`t remember its name but I expected to see it listed here, especially since the page was updated 3 days ago. It provided quantitative answers to questions. A new type of search engine was described in one of the Toronto, Canada, newspapers a few weeks ago by a writer who had tried it out. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |